{"id":9272,"date":"2023-04-12T14:57:20","date_gmt":"2023-04-12T03:57:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/?p=9272"},"modified":"2023-04-18T14:41:15","modified_gmt":"2023-04-18T03:41:15","slug":"what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt","title":{"rendered":"What can the Legal Industry Reasonably Expect out of ChatGPT?"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>During the recent Legalweek, panelists debated what impact ChatGPT and generative AI could have on the legal industry, if any, but urged caution nonetheless.<\/h4>\n<p>It\u2019s safe to say that ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI) as a whole have captured the imaginations of those in professional services like few technologies have before. The idea behind ChatGPT seems simple: You ask it a question, in plain language, and it provides a straightforward answer to your prompt.<\/p>\n<p>However, the reality remains far from simple. There are layers of algorithms that create content (thus the <em>generative<\/em> part of the name) by continually predicting the next word, with extremely large data sets needed to make these predictions accurate. Further, the newly-released GPT-4 is even multi-modal, meaning it can accept both text and image inputs, which ratchets up the complexity even further.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, even among the most optimistic technologists, there remains some <a href=\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/generative-ai-tools-for-budget-starved-corporate-law-departments-risks-and-opportunities\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">generative AI risks that can\u2019t be ignored<\/a>. And as a key panel, <em>Reshaping the Legal Profession: Thriving in the Age of Generative AI &amp; ChatGPT<\/em>, at the recent <a href=\"https:\/\/www.event.law.com\/legalweek\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Legalweek<\/a> explored, the heavily hyped technology may be less of a do-it-all tool and more of a \u201cmoderately bright, but very lazy first-year associate.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2>What generative AI is &amp; what it isn\u2019t<\/h2>\n<p>That comparison came courtesy of panelist Aaron Crews, currently Chief Product &amp; Innovation Officer at alternative legal service provider UnitedLex and formerly Chief Data Analytics Officer at law firm Littler Mendelson. Crews noted that while many legaltech types have high hopes for generative AI use in law, including himself, at its core the technology isn\u2019t that revolutionary.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cGenerative AI is fancy marketing-speak for a machine that anticipates where you want to go next,\u201d he said, adding that while there may be high expectations of a tool named artificial intelligence, in reality \u201cit\u2019s not intelligent.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, generative AI is bounded by the data that is put into the system. That means that ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI and currently the most famous generative AI platform, has access to untold amounts of data to make its predictions \u2014 but that data is only current as of 2021, meaning it cannot adjust to newer events.<\/p>\n<p>The tool also suffers from \u201challucinations,\u201d meaning that sometimes the technology \u201cpredicts\u201d facts that have no actual basis in reality. In one notable case, as explained by panelist Foster Sayers, General Counsel &amp; Chief Evangelist at software company Pramata, a Michigan judge tried asking ChatGPT about why a certain court decision was decided the way it was and found that ChatGPT completely made-up precedential cases \u2014 something the judge caught easily, since he had decided the case himself.<\/p>\n<p>With the recent release of GPT-4, <a href=\"https:\/\/openai.com\/research\/gpt-4\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">OpenAI claims<\/a> a factual accuracy rate between 70% and 80%, depending on the subject matter. But that 20% below perfect is \u201csignificant\u201d in law, explained another panelist, Ilona Logvinova, Associate General Counsel at McKinsey &amp; Company. Technologists in law often run into risk-averse attorneys and clients, where one bad experience can lead to a closed door for all future technological advancements. And although some companies and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legallydisrupted.com\/p\/so-how-good-is-chatgpt-at-drafting\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">even some law firms<\/a> are hiring for a new role known as a prompt engineer to ask generative AI platforms more specific questions to get a desired outcome, it\u2019s impossible to create a foolproof system.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPrompt engineers are getting more popular, but they\u2019re also learning on the spot,\u201d Logvinova noted.<\/p>\n<h2>So where\u2019s the use?<\/h2>\n<p>That\u2019s not to say that generative AI will fall by the wayside, however. The panel identified a few potential use cases for generative AI in professional services as it now stands: document analysis, review and drafting; research and knowledge management; contract analysis and drafting; and chatbots and assistants. However, the technology is moving quickly, and so too are its potential applications, panelists added.<\/p>\n<p>One panelist, Danielle Benecke, Founder of Baker McKenzie Machine Learning at law firm Baker McKenzie, noted that \u201cfirms and other enterprises have been sitting on this unstructured data forever,\u201d which generative AI can help unlock.<\/p>\n<p>However, while many regular generative AI use cases focus on the wide data sets the tool already has, it\u2019s more interesting to start with the enterprise\u2019s data and running AI against it, Benecke explained, adding that, for example, a firm\u2019s M&amp;A deal room could run generative AI against the data set and theoretically create a due diligence checklist based on the firm\u2019s contracts that are already in place.<\/p>\n<p>Pramata\u2019s Sayers did question how much better generative AI is at producing new documents and contracts than simply using regular templates. While generative AI may produce bespoke work product, legal documents often have to be worded in a very specific way that\u2019s tough to predict, he said. Contract experts such as TermScout\u2019s Evan Harris have <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legallydisrupted.com\/p\/so-how-good-is-chatgpt-at-drafting\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">noted the same<\/a>, finding that while generative AI can create a passable first draft contract, the outputs still require a good deal of editing and governance.<\/p>\n<p>With these limitations in mind, Logvinova added \u201cit\u2019s safer and less risky\u201d to use generative AI for internal purposes rather than for client-facing content or communications. Crews agreed, saying that he \u201cabsolutely would not\u201d use ChatGPT for client work as the technology currently stands, but that it may be helpful in fast-forwarding the data creation and ingestion process.<\/p>\n<p>No matter the use case, however, all panelists agreed it\u2019s paramount to avoid the temptation of adopting generative AI just out of curiosity. Due to its risks, and with the technology in its early stages, any use should be conducted with the firm\u2019s overall data strategy underpinning the AI use and with a specific goal in mind.<\/p>\n<p>Benecke said her exploration of generative AI primarily focuses on holistic applications across the firm rather than one-off use cases. Any time the firm adopts an AI tool, she said, it\u2019s with the specific goal to \u201csupercharge the firm\u2019s most valuable pre-existing service lines,\u201d directly tying the AI use with a firm strategic initiative.<\/p>\n<p>Still, there remains a number of unknowns about generative AI\u2019s use in professional services, and <a href=\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/generative-ai-tools-for-budget-starved-corporate-law-departments-risks-and-opportunities\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">the balance between risk and innovation with generative AI<\/a> weighing on the scale is one that firms are still working out.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBe forward-leaning, but be smart about your governance,\u201d Benecke warned. \u201cYou don\u2019t want to be that cautionary tale.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><em>This article was originally published on the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thomsonreuters.com\/en-us\/posts\/legal\/legalweek-chatgpt-expectations\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Thomson Reuters Institute<\/a>, and features on Insight with permission.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"nc_pixel\" src=\"https:\/\/pixel.welcomesoftware.com\/px.gif?key=YXJ0aWNsZT05MDM0NGM0MGQ4ZTExMWVkYjZmYjEyMGRmYmUxMGUxZg==\" alt=\"\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It\u2019s safe to say that ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI) as a whole have captured the imaginations of those in professional services like few technologies have before.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":152,"featured_media":9271,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[645,602],"tags":[1915,1916,1918],"insight_job_role":[],"insight_practice_area":[],"class_list":["entry","author-legalexecutiveinstitute1","has-excerpt","post-9272","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-innovation-and-disruption-in-law","category-innovation-and-technology","tag-chatgpt","tag-chatgpt-4","tag-legal-industry","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>What can the Legal industry Reasonably Expect out of ChatGPT?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"During Legalweek, panelists debated what impact ChatGPT and generative AI could have on the legal industry, if any, but urged caution nonetheless.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"What can the Legal industry Reasonably Expect out of ChatGPT?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"During Legalweek, panelists debated what impact ChatGPT and generative AI could have on the legal industry, if any, but urged caution nonetheless.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"TR - Legal Insight Australia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-04-12T03:57:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-04-18T03:41:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2023\/04\/What-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-ChatGPT.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1113\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Thomson Reuters\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Thomson Reuters\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Thomson Reuters\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#\/schema\/person\/fe358312887da1e55a1a9e9e8fc20c7f\"},\"headline\":\"What can the Legal Industry Reasonably Expect out of ChatGPT?\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-04-12T03:57:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-04-18T03:41:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt\"},\"wordCount\":1080,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2023\/04\/What-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-ChatGPT.jpeg\",\"keywords\":[\"ChatGPT\",\"ChatGPT-4\",\"legal industry\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Innovation and Disruption in Law\",\"Innovation and Technology\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt\",\"name\":\"What can the Legal industry Reasonably Expect out of ChatGPT?\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2023\/04\/What-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-ChatGPT.jpeg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-04-12T03:57:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-04-18T03:41:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#\/schema\/person\/fe358312887da1e55a1a9e9e8fc20c7f\"},\"description\":\"During Legalweek, panelists debated what impact ChatGPT and generative AI could have on the legal industry, if any, but urged caution nonetheless.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2023\/04\/What-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-ChatGPT.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2023\/04\/What-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-ChatGPT.jpeg\",\"width\":2500,\"height\":1113,\"caption\":\"What can the legal industry reasonably expect out of ChatGPT?\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"What can the Legal Industry Reasonably Expect out of ChatGPT?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/\",\"name\":\"TR - Legal Insight Australia\",\"description\":\"Just another Legal Hub site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#\/schema\/person\/fe358312887da1e55a1a9e9e8fc20c7f\",\"name\":\"Thomson Reuters\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/be9e8ef62c38bd930f9a6125deb02f591bc8b28a641bf379b2529af0de57b12f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/be9e8ef62c38bd930f9a6125deb02f591bc8b28a641bf379b2529af0de57b12f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/be9e8ef62c38bd930f9a6125deb02f591bc8b28a641bf379b2529af0de57b12f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Thomson Reuters\"},\"description\":\"Thomson Reuters, a worldwide trusted provider of answers, helps professionals make confident decisions, run better businesses and gain competitive advantage in complex arenas \u2013 law, tax, compliance, government and media.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/contributors\/legalexecutiveinstitute1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"What can the Legal industry Reasonably Expect out of ChatGPT?","description":"During Legalweek, panelists debated what impact ChatGPT and generative AI could have on the legal industry, if any, but urged caution nonetheless.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"What can the Legal industry Reasonably Expect out of ChatGPT?","og_description":"During Legalweek, panelists debated what impact ChatGPT and generative AI could have on the legal industry, if any, but urged caution nonetheless.","og_url":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt","og_site_name":"TR - Legal Insight Australia","article_published_time":"2023-04-12T03:57:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-04-18T03:41:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2500,"height":1113,"url":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2023\/04\/What-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-ChatGPT.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Thomson Reuters","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Thomson Reuters","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt"},"author":{"name":"Thomson Reuters","@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#\/schema\/person\/fe358312887da1e55a1a9e9e8fc20c7f"},"headline":"What can the Legal Industry Reasonably Expect out of ChatGPT?","datePublished":"2023-04-12T03:57:20+00:00","dateModified":"2023-04-18T03:41:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt"},"wordCount":1080,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2023\/04\/What-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-ChatGPT.jpeg","keywords":["ChatGPT","ChatGPT-4","legal industry"],"articleSection":["Innovation and Disruption in Law","Innovation and Technology"],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt","url":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt","name":"What can the Legal industry Reasonably Expect out of ChatGPT?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2023\/04\/What-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-ChatGPT.jpeg","datePublished":"2023-04-12T03:57:20+00:00","dateModified":"2023-04-18T03:41:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#\/schema\/person\/fe358312887da1e55a1a9e9e8fc20c7f"},"description":"During Legalweek, panelists debated what impact ChatGPT and generative AI could have on the legal industry, if any, but urged caution nonetheless.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2023\/04\/What-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-ChatGPT.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2023\/04\/What-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-ChatGPT.jpeg","width":2500,"height":1113,"caption":"What can the legal industry reasonably expect out of ChatGPT?"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/what-can-the-legal-industry-reasonably-expect-out-of-chatgpt#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"What can the Legal Industry Reasonably Expect out of ChatGPT?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#website","url":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/","name":"TR - Legal Insight Australia","description":"Just another Legal Hub site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#\/schema\/person\/fe358312887da1e55a1a9e9e8fc20c7f","name":"Thomson Reuters","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/be9e8ef62c38bd930f9a6125deb02f591bc8b28a641bf379b2529af0de57b12f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/be9e8ef62c38bd930f9a6125deb02f591bc8b28a641bf379b2529af0de57b12f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/be9e8ef62c38bd930f9a6125deb02f591bc8b28a641bf379b2529af0de57b12f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Thomson Reuters"},"description":"Thomson Reuters, a worldwide trusted provider of answers, helps professionals make confident decisions, run better businesses and gain competitive advantage in complex arenas \u2013 law, tax, compliance, government and media.","url":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/contributors\/legalexecutiveinstitute1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9272","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/152"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9272"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9272\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9271"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9272"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9272"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9272"},{"taxonomy":"insight_job_role","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/insight_job_role?post=9272"},{"taxonomy":"insight_practice_area","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/insight_practice_area?post=9272"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}