{"id":3405,"date":"2020-06-18T06:44:01","date_gmt":"2020-06-18T06:44:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/?p=3405"},"modified":"2022-08-03T16:03:46","modified_gmt":"2022-08-03T05:03:46","slug":"court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting","title":{"rendered":"Court of Criminal Appeal Quashes Tax Crime Convictions After Crown’s Creative Accounting"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

In Castagna v R; Agius v R<\/em> [2019] NSWCCA 114 (Castagna; Agius<\/em>), the Court of Criminal Appeal (CCA) allowed appeals from Dr Anthony Castagna and Mr Robert Agius, quashed certain convictions and entered verdicts of acquittal.<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

In this article, I\u2019ll run through the finer points surrounding the prosecution and outline why it ultimately failed. Continue reading to work out what the outcome of the case has revealed about the intricacies of the authorities\u2019 accounting practices. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The alleged conspiracies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Dr Castagna and Mr Agius were charged with offences under the Crimes Act 1914<\/em> (Cth) and the Schedule to the Criminal Code Act 1995<\/em> (Cth) (Criminal Code<\/em>) over payments made by Macquarie Bank Ltd and its associated companies in exchange for the supply of Dr Castagna\u2019s services as a consultant during a period of time from 1998 to 2009. It was alleged that Dr Castagna was required to declare these payments as part of his \u201cassessable income\u201d for income tax purposes and that he failed to do so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In particular, the Crown alleged two conspiracies between Dr Castagna and Mr Agius:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

  1. To defraud or cause financial loss to the Commonwealth by concealing Dr Castagna\u2019s assessable income; and<\/li>
  2. To deal with money which was the proceeds of crime, being the part of the payments not declared as \u201cassessable income\u201d.<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    Contended shady payments and agreements<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    The payments were made by Macquarie Bank and its associated companies pursuant to a series of agreements between itself, Dr Castagna, and Billbury Ltd, a company controlled by Mr Agius. There was no suggestion that the agreements between Macquarie Bank, Dr Castagna and Billbury were \u201cshams\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The agreements provided that Billbury would supply Dr Castagna\u2019s services as a consultant in exchange for the payments from Macquarie Bank. The agreements did not provide for any payment to be made directly to Dr Castagna.  This was because Macquarie Bank required all agreements with its consultants to be with legal, but not natural, persons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Related: <\/strong>High Court Confirms \u2018Cuckoo Smurfing\u2019 Alive and Well<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    At first instance, the prosecution case was that, even though the payments were made to Billbury and the agreements between Macquarie Bank, Billbury and Dr Castagna were not \u201cshams\u201d, the payments were \u201cordinary income\u201d which had been \u201cderived\u201d by Dr Castagna within the meaning of s 6-5(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 <\/em>(Cth), and therefore were \u201cassessable income\u201d which he had not but was required to declare on his income tax returns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Defence for both Dr Castagna and Mr Agius made an application for a directed verdict at the trial on the basis that, as a matter of law, the payments to Billbury could not be \u201cordinary income\u201d which had been \u201cderived\u201d by Dr Castagna by reason of the terms of the agreements between Macquarie Bank, Billbury and Dr Castagna. The primary judge of these applications and the jury later found Dr Castagna and Mr Agius guilty in relation to both conspiracies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    On appeal, the Crown contended that it was open to the jury to hold that the payments to Billbury formed part of Dr Castagna\u2019s assessable income because they were held by Billbury on trust for Dr Castagna. Having not been part of the trial, both Dr Castagna and Mr Agius both objected to this new analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Putting the prohibition on taking a new position on appeal to one side, the purported existence of a trust or trusts does not appear to be the only alternative basis that the Crown could have sought to \u201cassess\u201d Dr Castagna for the purposes of the alleged conspiracies.  Two other bases that may have been available on the Crown\u2019s case theory could have been constructive receipt and\/or agency.  The overarching problem with all three of these analyses is that they do not appear to be supported by the effect of the consultancy and related documents in evidence.  Moreover, without evidence of sham agreements and\/or entities, agreements mean what they say and corporations are taken to enjoy separate legal personality from their directors and shareholders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    How the appeals were resolved<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    In resolving the appeals, the CCA (Bathurst CJ; Macfarlan JA; Gleeson JA) decided three issues.  First it held the primary judge erred on the applications for directed verdicts.  Secondly, the court held it was not open to the jury to find that the payments to Billbury formed part of Dr Castagna\u2019s \u201cassessable income\u201d because they were held by Billbury on trust for Dr Castagna. The prosecution had not put any such case to the jury at trial.  Therefore, the convictions of Dr Castagna and Mr Agius could not be supported.  Thirdly, the CCA declined to order a retrial and entered verdicts of acquittal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Paving the way for similar cases in the future<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    Castagna v R; Agius v R <\/em>is an important case because the CCA has confirmed the general law position in criminal cases that, where transactions are entered into that are not shams with non-sham entities, such agreements are to be given their effects.  Moreover, although the case did not expressly deal with sham entities (as opposed to agreements), it was assumed that the companies involved were not sham entities and they ought to be and were treated as legal persons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    More fundamentally, this case is important to the criminal law because it now reflects better the law of tax administration in that tax-related liabilities arise objectively.  Although alternatives may arise, especially in more complex transactions, at the end of the day tax-related liabilities are objective and arise – or don\u2019t arise, depending on the facts coupled with objective formulae in the tax law.  Although certain (especially complex) cases may give rise to multiple possible assessment bases, the ascertainment of tax-related liabilities is a matter of discretion for neither investigating entities nor prosecuting authorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    If you liked this, try reading:<\/strong> Who Will AUSTRAC Turn to Next?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    From a planning perspective, the case has significance too. Castagna v R; Agius v R<\/em> suggests that taxpayers and their advisers who transact in accordance and compliance with the objective formulae set out in the tax law (to the extent that such can be obtained) should not have to fear conviction based on creative or discretionary interpretations of commercial and tax law by investigating and prosecuting authorities.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Why did this tax criminal case ultimately fail? Find out – along with what the outcome of the case has revealed about tax intricate accounting practices – here. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":88,"featured_media":3408,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[646,648],"tags":[1234,1398,1399,163,1400,1397],"insight_job_role":[569,1315,628],"insight_practice_area":[584,1401],"class_list":["entry","author-matthewdaly","has-excerpt","post-3405","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-legal-commentary-and-opinion","category-legislation-and-case-law","tag-accounting","tag-court-of-criminal-appeal","tag-crimes-act","tag-criminal-code","tag-tax-crime","tag-tax-law","insight_job_role-academic","insight_job_role-barrister","insight_job_role-solicitor","insight_practice_area-criminal-law","insight_practice_area-tax-law","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nCourt of Criminal Appeal Quashes Tax Crime Convictions After Crown's Creative Accounting - TR - Legal Insight Australia<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Court of Criminal Appeal Quashes Tax Crime Convictions After Crown's Creative Accounting - TR - Legal Insight Australia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Why did this tax criminal case ultimately fail? Find out - along with what the outcome of the case has revealed about tax intricate accounting practices - here.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"TR - Legal Insight Australia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-06-18T06:44:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-08-03T05:03:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2020\/06\/GettyImages-1206860583.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dr Mathew Leighton-Daly\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dr Mathew Leighton-Daly\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Dr Mathew Leighton-Daly\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#\/schema\/person\/a7f31248d721abf2148d4715c7b15a0b\"},\"headline\":\"Court of Criminal Appeal Quashes Tax Crime Convictions After Crown’s Creative Accounting\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-06-18T06:44:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-08-03T05:03:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting\"},\"wordCount\":1061,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2020\/06\/GettyImages-1206860583.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Accounting\",\"court of criminal appeal\",\"crimes act\",\"criminal code\",\"tax crime\",\"tax law\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Legal Commentary and Opinion\",\"Legislation and Case Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting\",\"name\":\"Court of Criminal Appeal Quashes Tax Crime Convictions After Crown's Creative Accounting - TR - Legal Insight Australia\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2020\/06\/GettyImages-1206860583.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-06-18T06:44:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-08-03T05:03:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#\/schema\/person\/a7f31248d721abf2148d4715c7b15a0b\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2020\/06\/GettyImages-1206860583.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2020\/06\/GettyImages-1206860583.jpg\",\"width\":2000,\"height\":1500,\"caption\":\"COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL QUASHES TAX CRIME CONVICTIONS AFTER CROWN\u2019S CREATIVE ACCOUNTING\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Court of Criminal Appeal Quashes Tax Crime Convictions After Crown’s Creative Accounting\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/\",\"name\":\"TR - Legal Insight Australia\",\"description\":\"Just another Legal Hub site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#\/schema\/person\/a7f31248d721abf2148d4715c7b15a0b\",\"name\":\"Dr Mathew Leighton-Daly\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2026\/04\/cropped-matthew-leighton-daly-96x96.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2026\/04\/cropped-matthew-leighton-daly-96x96.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2026\/04\/cropped-matthew-leighton-daly-96x96.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Dr Mathew Leighton-Daly\"},\"description\":\"Dr Mathew Leighton-Daly is the commissioned author of our Financial Crime Control and Anti-Money Laundering online publication. A Special Counsel at HWLE Lawyers, he is also a Visiting Academic at The University of Sydney Law School and an Industry Fellow at Griffith University. Dr Leighton-Daly is an internationally recognised specialist in financial crime control.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/contributors\/matthewdaly\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Court of Criminal Appeal Quashes Tax Crime Convictions After Crown's Creative Accounting - TR - Legal Insight Australia","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Court of Criminal Appeal Quashes Tax Crime Convictions After Crown's Creative Accounting - TR - Legal Insight Australia","og_description":"Why did this tax criminal case ultimately fail? Find out - along with what the outcome of the case has revealed about tax intricate accounting practices - here.","og_url":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting","og_site_name":"TR - Legal Insight Australia","article_published_time":"2020-06-18T06:44:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-08-03T05:03:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":1500,"url":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2020\/06\/GettyImages-1206860583.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Dr Mathew Leighton-Daly","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Dr Mathew Leighton-Daly","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting"},"author":{"name":"Dr Mathew Leighton-Daly","@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#\/schema\/person\/a7f31248d721abf2148d4715c7b15a0b"},"headline":"Court of Criminal Appeal Quashes Tax Crime Convictions After Crown’s Creative Accounting","datePublished":"2020-06-18T06:44:01+00:00","dateModified":"2022-08-03T05:03:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting"},"wordCount":1061,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2020\/06\/GettyImages-1206860583.jpg","keywords":["Accounting","court of criminal appeal","crimes act","criminal code","tax crime","tax law"],"articleSection":["Legal Commentary and Opinion","Legislation and Case Law"],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting","url":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting","name":"Court of Criminal Appeal Quashes Tax Crime Convictions After Crown's Creative Accounting - TR - Legal Insight Australia","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2020\/06\/GettyImages-1206860583.jpg","datePublished":"2020-06-18T06:44:01+00:00","dateModified":"2022-08-03T05:03:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#\/schema\/person\/a7f31248d721abf2148d4715c7b15a0b"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2020\/06\/GettyImages-1206860583.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2020\/06\/GettyImages-1206860583.jpg","width":2000,"height":1500,"caption":"COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL QUASHES TAX CRIME CONVICTIONS AFTER CROWN\u2019S CREATIVE ACCOUNTING"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/posts\/court-of-criminal-appeal-quashes-tax-crime-convictions-after-crowns-creative-accounting#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Court of Criminal Appeal Quashes Tax Crime Convictions After Crown’s Creative Accounting"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#website","url":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/","name":"TR - Legal Insight Australia","description":"Just another Legal Hub site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/#\/schema\/person\/a7f31248d721abf2148d4715c7b15a0b","name":"Dr Mathew Leighton-Daly","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2026\/04\/cropped-matthew-leighton-daly-96x96.jpg","url":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2026\/04\/cropped-matthew-leighton-daly-96x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/8\/2026\/04\/cropped-matthew-leighton-daly-96x96.jpg","caption":"Dr Mathew Leighton-Daly"},"description":"Dr Mathew Leighton-Daly is the commissioned author of our Financial Crime Control and Anti-Money Laundering online publication. A Special Counsel at HWLE Lawyers, he is also a Visiting Academic at The University of Sydney Law School and an Industry Fellow at Griffith University. Dr Leighton-Daly is an internationally recognised specialist in financial crime control.","url":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/contributors\/matthewdaly"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3405","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/88"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3405"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3405\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3408"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3405"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3405"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3405"},{"taxonomy":"insight_job_role","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/insight_job_role?post=3405"},{"taxonomy":"insight_practice_area","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insight.thomsonreuters.com.au\/legal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/insight_practice_area?post=3405"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}